Economics.

Beware The Ides of March…

Posted on Updated on

Can You Trust Your Bank

Students of Literature, will recognise the title from the warning given to Julius Ceasar, as epitomised in the Shakespearean play of that name.

It was a warning to the general, to beware, by a soothsayer (who remains nameless). A warning that apparently he ignored. Of course, as the conspirators – the Senators, stabbed at Ceasar, and Marcus Brutus a former long-time friend plunged his knife into the man, Shakespeare’s Ceasar uttered those now immortal words – “Et tu Bruté” (And you Brutus?)

Of course, in the modern era, the last major play, that resembles this drama, is the death of John Fitzgerald Kennedy on November 22nd 1963, as he was brutally slaughtered by a conspiratorial cabal operating in the upper echelons of the power political scene in America.

Who all these conspirators are, has remained largely unspoken… But some people, are doing what should have been done 50+ years ago, by the Dallas Police, before the CIA and the FBI took over the post assassination conspiratorial machinations, to cover up their involvement, and to plant the idea in the public’s mind, that “it was a lone gunman” a Russian Sympathiser, who spent three years in Russia, but who was in receipt of $200 per month from the FBI as an informer, and who received special training by the CIA to learn Russian, before he allegedly dropped out by going to Russia and staying there for three years…

Those invoved in the Conspiracy carefully massaged the images and the Warren Commission headed up by the very man, that Kennedy had fired just a few months earlier as Head of the CIA to ensure the story remained “on message”.

Of course George Herbert Walker Bush, when asked where he was at the time of the shooting, had vague recollections of where he was, despite someone of that name making a call to J. Edgar Hoover’s office – Head of the FBI just hours after the shooting proving he was in a hotel in Dallas. And his recollections apparently varied on subsequent questioning of the same incident, The same George H. W. Bush who went on to be Carter’s head of CIA, and then Vice President, during the 8 years that Ronald Reagan was President, and almost made it to the presidency when President Reagan was shot, by a lone nutter… But the President in true Cowboy hero fashion, survived.

JFK’s brother Robert Kennedy who also later ran for political office also met a sudden death when yet another lone nutter (CIA – MK-Ultra participant?) allegedly shot him at close quarters as he emerged from the hotel kitchen into the glare of waiting reporters, TV cameras and waiting dignatories – and CIA operatives?

Here is the best documentary I’ve seen on this and other subjects…

JFK Jr., had his 3rd birthday just three days after his father’s death, and after growing up and becoming by, all accounts, an honourable man, handsome, suave, considerate and latterly a pilot and publisher of a magazine called “George” – Was this a clue to the mystery surrounding his father’s demise?Why George?

And of course, John F Kennedy Junior ALSO met an untimely demise, when his plane came down late in the evening, as his plane disappeared off his flight path and plunged into the Atlantic, just 1 minute after he called in to the Martha’s Vineyard Airport, to say he was at 2,500 feet and ready to descend to the airport… But he never made it, falling out of the sky almost vertically just 60 seconds later… Meanwhile, George Bush Junior, for the three days, was nowhere to be found… Hmmmm… “Curiouser, and Curiouser”…cried Alice…

You can get a better description of events here…

So what does this have to do with the Ides of March?

Well, as President Trump has already made known to the world, some of the things he wants to do is to “Drain the swamp”, and began the process, though CIA leaks have been made to discredit him, but even the MSM have had to eat some of their words. However, many things seem to be happening that suggests he won’t see out his full-term – one way or another…

Already people are setting Trump up for a fall… Here’s how Zero-Hedge put it


Roberto Gualtieri, chairman of the European Parliament’s economic and monetary affairs committee, also criticized Trump. “Some first concrete confirmations of a new more unilateral policy stance by the new U.S. administration, including on sensitive financial markets regulatory issues, raise concerns and require both thorough reflection and action from the EU side,” he told the committee.

Meanwhile, Draghi deflected accusations lobbed at him over the weekend by German finmin Schauble, who said not Germany, but the ECB and Mario Draghi, are responsible for the undervaluation of the euro:

And SGTReport who holds views similar to my own, regarding the economy,  believes  much the same with regard to Trump’s likely outcome, as those behind the scenes are attempting to undermine, discredit, or if they can’t impeach him, probably develop a plan to slay him, when they produced this video…

 

And of course #Pizzagate is just another FAKE News story…

Err.. Maybe.


And of course, it was Trump and those Russian hackers who stole the election… Except it wasn’t…

 

BUT, at least Trump is fighting back, and so are the Americans…

Those evil Bankers, Oil-men, Military Corporate CEOs and multi-million share-holders, and those working for them in the secretive security organisations – all 16 of them, are now going to have their teeth pulled as the fight-back begins…As Ron Paul, that arch-enemy of the Federal Reserve has already had his £0.02 worth..

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-08/arizona-senate-committee-passes-bill-treat-gold-money-remove-capital-gains-tax

So, if you’re in the markets, now might be prudent to lower your risk somewhat… Events have a habit of coming out of the blue, and given recent rises to bubble territory… and Cliff High’s, Jim Rickards’ and Bill Bonner’s and JIm Willie’s and Peter Schiff’s, David Morgan’s and Dr. Paul Craig Robert’s warnings a pull-back is long overdue.

UPDATE

This is an important adjunct to the above piece, as events come into focus:

The 15th March (Ides) is the day that Netherlands goes to the polls to elect a new leader. One in which the populist Geert Wilders is steadily making progress in the polls and is looking increasingly likely to win. BUT as Turkey and the Dutch go head to head over the latest political intrigue, will this mean Wilders gets more of the sympathetic vote, against the population concerned about the (as they see it) invasion of Islamists guaranteeing him the  vote?

The second concerning thing is the reaching of the $20 Trillion debt ceiling in the U.S. on that date, while also the Federal Reserve on that day too will decide whether to raise interest rates for just the 3rd time in 10 years.

And, in the UK, after the House of Commons rejected the amendment voted for by the House of Lords, this frees the PM’s hands to announce the formal Brexit process.

And finally, Clif High – researcher, has been announcing over the last two months that March onwards is likely to be tumultuous, and after all that, I found this…(below)

Anyone who has been reading this blog for any length of time, will know my feelings on Precious metals, and this just threw petrol on the bonfire.

 

 

 

 

If you think this piece is good, and would like to post it or link to it, as long as we’re quoted as the originators, please do so.

 

And don’t forget to like us, or post a link on your facebook or twitter feed…

Just Another Fake News Story?

Posted on Updated on

Whilst browsing the internet, I come across many things, that deserve a wider audience, but am unable to offer any further evidence of these sometimes outlandish claims. Not so today.

This piece linked to below, really revolves around a much talked about subject, and one I have myself been involved in writing about, so this piece would appear to add further credence to the mystery.

http://themillenniumreport.com/2016/10/treason-who-did-911-and-why-did-they-do-it/

Who was responsible for 9/11?  WHY did they carry out the attacks of the World Trade Center (WTC)?  And if two planes brought down buildings one and two, how did building 7, a block or two away, across a wide expanse, collapse vertically, and yet was still upright when a BBC news anchor with a live link behind her, showing the building – that could be seen by all those sufficiently awake to notice, – was still visible, while we were being told that the building had already gone down?

The piece linked to above reads like an episode of: “The Bourne Trilogy” with a cast of characters taken from: Politics, Corporate Energy, Mafia and Banking Interests across the western world. I wrote too in the book  “The Coming Battle – 2013”  that events were spiralling out of control.

General Wesley Clark in a video interview explained that he was told in advance of plans to intervene in seven middle-eastern countries, all based on the lie of 9/11… The latest in a long line of black-ops “False-Flag” events, that were used to sway American -and in this case – worldwide opinion to permit those with their own agenda to influence events. And he also discussed what happened next and he recalled how the decision was taken back in 1991 –

It used to be that the propagandists with people inside the military and secret service industries, could modify the News agenda to get the outcomes that they wanted, and due to secrecy laws, their misdeeds would go unpunished for thirty years or more until after the secret documents could be widely accessed. BUT, the Internet has changed all that. The Mainstream News Organisations (MSM) exist to make money for their shareholders and senior management teams – and the corporations that advertise and market their wares on them, are generally large multi-nationals – the very corporations that the MSM is supposed to be keeping a beady eye on, in its role as defender of the public and the customer,  are the very same ones using politics to pursue their own agenda.

As ever, “He who pays the piper, calls the tune.”

So, as corruption apparently swirls around the world, I hear of imminent plans to rid the world of physical coins and notes – particularly in America, where many of the U.S.’s states, and institutions are seemingly hell-bent on destroying the last vestige of freedom – the freedom to spend as you like – by outlawing payment in anything other than digital means.

So will Gold and Silver be once more used to “Barter” with?

Will the closure of your bank, be the event that makes you take action?

Will the ATM closing, or your Bank closing one weekend and not re-opening again on Monday make you take action?

Will the disappearance of your pension fund make you take action?

The time has come.

 

 

 

The Last Chance Saloon…

Posted on Updated on

Then… and NOW…(upto 2014)

The big decline in the precious metals prices from 2011 to today, punctuated by a sharp reversal beginning in early 2016, appears to already be undergoing a final exhaustive bout of selling. The big decline remains to be the most important development for gold and silver investors. Why? Because this decline’s end is likely to present the ultimate buying opportunity for precious metals and for PM mining stocks over the next decade.

Before elaborating on this all-important issue, let’s briefly discuss the current events. The USD Index has rallied as it moved higher recently, due in large part to Fed jabbering about rate hikes, and the final 0.25% rise recently, after Gold reached its March 2016 interim high, with further talk of 3 more rate hikes in 2017, this dampened enthusiasm in the paper markets ensuring those with derivatives on their side could short the metals and thus drive down the price to interim lows, but the New Year will probably reverse that, as the festive season ends.

I’ve previously said that it was possible that we would see something like that in the short term. That’s exactly what happened – metals and miners moved a little lower especially in recent weeks. BUT, just before Xmas is when people are buying gifts for friends and family, not thinking about their portfolios, so markets quite often, soften at this time of year. So, for the brave, a VERY good time to buy metals and/or stocks (as I did today) in those companies with good assets, strong management and good fundamentals, with a longer term strategy for improvement in what should be a rising market for PMs – especially as the Trump win, will probably mean rising inflation for that nation in the medium term – if he keeps his promises.

Those companies who report in British Pounds, will also have a major boost to their bottom line, as profits reported in pounds sterling will reflect the recent decline in the pound’s value versus the dollar, in which many commodities are priced on international markets.

I’ve discussed the final bottom target for gold in previous posts, at circa 50% of the most recent high ($1925 – in 2011) – Here we discuss WHEN gold is likely to bottom.

Today’s price of $1129.85 is not quite at the lowest point – that was $1065 in the middle of 2015, but this pull back from the $1320 area of a few months ago, serves to mark what could be the nadir of a cup and handle formation on the Gold Chart, though it might more likely resemble a shallow bowl, as this decline extends for another year of the secular bear, in a longer term Bull market.

What may seem odd, on a quite different chart – is the one I’ve posted several times since the start of this blog, featuring the comparison of the last two decades with the late 1960s to 1981.

Why? Because, in a globalized economy with interconnected financial markets, no asset can move totally independently from other ones – and this is especially the case with gold and the Dollar. In most cases when the USD plunges a lot, gold is likely to rally a lot and when the USD soars, gold is likely to decline substantially. That’s likely to change in the final stage of the precious metals bull market, but it doesn’t seem we are quite at that point yet.

Therefore, the million-dollar question can be asked differently: when is the USD Index likely to form a very important top in the near term?

In my opinion, it’s most likely to happen in late January or early February 2017, with the second half of January being the most probable target. Trump’s Presidency begins at the peak of a long bull market in DOW stocks, due to Fed Funds Rates being as low as they are, with ESF (Exchange Stabilization fund) intervention and interest rate rises, which will begin to affect costs of doing business, in America, which will add to those corporation’s costs, yet do little to stimulate consumer spending which features so large in the overall picture in the U.S..

Let’s start with the discovery. What was the key thing that happened in the USD Index in the past few years? It rallied sharply and broke the all-important 100 level, or rather – it tried to – break above it, but failed and declined substantially. There were other attempts and they failed as well and were followed by an even bigger decline.

Since history rhymes, the big question is: “When did we see something similar?” Almost 20 years ago – in 1997. That’s the only time in the past 20+ years, when the weekly RSI was well over 80 (besides late 2014 and early 2015). This fact alone is something that should get your curiosity, but the big number of other similarities and how precise the key one is, should get your attention.

After the USD Index initially moved above 100 in August 1997, it declined sharply and it took several months before the next rally begun. The rally started after the USD moved to the 50-week moving average. That’s exactly what we saw in the more recent past – in 2015. What happened next in 1998? The USD tried moving above 100 a few more times, but finally declined substantially and this time the decline took the USD to a new low. Again, the same thing happened in 2015 and 2016. The shape of the rallies and declines was not identical, but it’s nothing to call home about – after all, very different events accompanied both time frames.

Up to this moment, the above analogy can be viewed as interesting, but perhaps not particularly important. What changes everything is an additional analogy – the size (in terms of both the price and extent) and shape of the 1975 – 1977 Gold price decline. The entire price trend, from 1968-1975, you would be able to guess by looking at the chart above, is eerily similar, to the period from 2000 to 2016, just merely extended over a few more years in these latest charts. Of course, the moves are not 100% identical, but are so close that we can view them as such.

In light of such significant similarity, we simply can’t ignore the likelihood that what followed the previous USD bottoms are going to follow these as well – especially as, so far this similarity is playing out near-perfectly.

Plotting the 1998 – 1999 rally on the current situation provides us with approximately 104 as the USD next target, but let’s focus on something different. How is the USD Index moving after the bottom?

Back in late 1998, the USD Index moved sharply higher, above the trend line and topped close to 97. Then it declined below 94, but the key thing is that it declined below the target line by approximately as much as it had previously rallied above it (in other words, the trend line continued to rally through the middle of the short-term decline). The bottom was formed more or less at the rising support line based on the previous important bottoms.

What happened earlier this year? Pretty much the same thing – the USD Index moved sharply above the rising trend line (the exact copy of the line from 1998 – 1999), then it declined below it by approximately as much as it had rallied above it previously, and bottomed. The bottom was formed more or less at the rising support line based on the previous important bottoms. The similarities are indeed extraordinary and the implications are very important. As far as the shape of the upcoming rally (the way the USD gets to its target) is concerned, we don’t have to see identical performance, just as the way in which the USD tried to move above 100 in 1998 wasn’t very similar to the way it tried to move above the same level in late 2015 and early 2016.

Still, the rally is very likely to end in a similar way to what we saw back in 1999 in terms of length and the size of the rally. So, when and how high is the USD Index likely to move? At the first sight we see that the target is at approximately the 104 level.

As far as time and the WHEN question is concerned, we saw the bottom in the dollar on May 3, 2016.

In technical analysis terms too there’s a big indicator. It’s the target based on the big reverse head-and-shoulders formation that started to form in late 2015 and was completed just a few days ago.

The size of the “head” in the head-and-shoulders and reverse-head-and-shoulders patterns is the size of the rally that’s likely to follow. We already saw the breakout (at about 96) so we can use this technique. We mark the size of the “head” and the target based on it. As discussed, this technique points to 104 as the next major target.

Given the likelihood that we’ll see a big rally in the USD Index in the coming weeks, there is a very good possibility that we’ll see gold at new lows. It seems that we still have time to prepare for the ultimate buying opportunity in gold, silver and mining stocks, but this time is rapidly running out. New Year’s Eve may be your last best chance.

So, will gold continue to plunge if the USD continues to rally, like it did in 1999 – 2001? Not necessarily. If could very well be the case that prolonged strength in the USD Index will not really be due to the inherent strength of the USD (or the U.S. economy), but due to weakness in the Euro (if the latter continues to exist, that is) and in other major currencies. George Soros, has reported that Brexit may cause the break-up of the Euro-area, and I have a sneaking suspicion, on this (as on many other things) he maybe right.

If this is the case, gold is likely to rally due to the demand from these other country’s Central Banks and investors fleeing the Euro. Consequently, the discussed analogy has important implications for the next few years.

The USD Index could continue to rally, but not necessarily due to the demand for dollars, but the lack of demand for other currencies. Especially if the EU implodes, then all bets are off.

One other thing that happened in recent weeks, was the events in India, where the Premier Modhi, used vague worries about the Black Market and Terrorism to attack both the currency markets, and the Gold markets simultaneously,… The abolishment of the 1,000 and 500 Rupee notes, and the slap down of the Gold markets were a sign that those behind the financial systems are terrified, that we the people will not give the government their taxes to pay down the debt, and these banksters might actually need to work for a living instead… (he said cynically)

Summing up, while the short-term indications for the precious metals sector remain range bound, the medium-term trend remains bullish and it seems that the final bottom will be formed in the first months of 2017, with the second half of January 2017 being the most probable time frame.

Meanwhile, it seems that any potential profits on my long positions will stagnate further before this trade is over and the up-trend resumes.

Here’s how we got here…

And, here, we hear how it will play out from one of the world’s best investors…

If you like this piece give us a like or share it to your FB page. (Click the buttons below)

After posting this, I came across this item in King World News web-site, that draws a similar comparison, to the one, I spotted some several years ago…

http://kingworldnews.com/worried-action-gold-silver-just-read/

In it we see the image below…Note: The image uses a logarithmic scale on the left, not Gold price… And suggests the 8-fold price rise we saw last time, from trough to peak, will be less than the next mania phase… We might conclude that it might be 10 x the low price of last year, taking the Gold price to circa $10,000… Remember where you heard it first…

kwn-goldpricecomparison1970-2000-20161021-1024x665

And Alex Jones is in sparkling form, as usual…

W.

The Eighth Wonder of the World… And a Curse.

Posted on Updated on

“Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world. He who understands it, earns it … he who doesn’t … pays it.” [Albert Einstein]

EyeOfTheStorm-Now

  1. 2008 – 2012
  2. 2012 – 2016
  3. 2016 – ? (2018-20?)

We are emerging from the eye of this particular storm…into more turbulent times ahead.

Uncertainty in politics, breeds uncertainty and volatility in economics and markets. People postpone major purchases until they have a clearer idea of how things will unfold. And businesses too, judge the future and make investment decisions accordingly. But the Debts built up during the 2008 crisis, have still to be repaid, and will now begin to unwind, or lead us into hyperinflation.

Having money in a bank account, that earns interest, is a distant memory for many people, as interest rates around the world have been reduced, eliminated or worse.

Britain’s and Western National Debts, have an interest charge levied on them, which is being, at least in part, controlled by the Federal Reserve, who came to Europe’s aid (again!) when it loaned $15 trillion during the heat of the last financial crisis. Britain too loaded itself up to the neck with debt, to help its banks, and latterly, International Banks from Greece, Spain, Ireland, and Portugal. and its current account is, as I have mentioned an enormous debt of — £1.7 Trillion. At a modest 0.0025% (¼%) that translates as …

Drumroll… £4,250,000,000 per year. (£4.25 billion…) However, even a modest increase to say 2% p.a. over the next 2 years, will likely kill the British economy, and with it, any hopes of a full recovery.

At 2% our debt repayments are: £34,000,000,000 – (£34 billion) enough to build approximately 50 new hospitals and staff them for a few years. Who said being a banker was easy?

But this image from Raoul Pal, tells the even bigger picture (even if it is a couple of years old).

Debt-2-GDP-Ratio

Whose debt is biggest?

The debt to GDP ratio includes pension and other obligations.  Is this why Britain’s politicians are so keen to import foreigners, to help pay off this debt?

Those savers who have worked hard all their life, and tucked away a little for their retirement, are earning precious little from their savings. Funds that perhaps they have ear-marked for a retirement home, a secure retirement future knowing that their money is safe in a Bank, or where they can get at it quickly, in the event of an emergency, to meet unexpected bills are shortly going to experience the greatest loss of value in their lives, through inflation.

In a world where money is finite: interest rates serve the function of allocating money to its competing potential users. Those that require investment money will bid for this scarce resource, driving up interest rates, in times of high demand. This rising interest rate trend signals to the business community, that there is high demand for money, and this can indicate that businesses are expanding, or that competition is increasing (usually early in the market cycle) and those who seek to spend for their current enjoyment, begin to realise that they cannot afford higher payments, and thus this slows the economy as spending is curbed.

When currency is infinite as is with Fractional Reserve Lending: the only brake on increased amounts is the Banker’s concerns as to whether they will get paid back, or not – and thus it might threaten their balance sheet. This leads to booms… and busts.

This has been the state of affairs ever since this practice was formed, but became worse when the world left the Gold Standard, and the U.S. finally severed the last remaining link to Gold on August 15th 1971, when Richard Milhous Nixon, closed the Gold Window.

Almost three years later Louise Auchincloss Boyer, fell from her 10th story window, just days after a story that she was alleged was to be the source of, that “All the Gold in Fort Knox has gone.” Her death was judged suicide… (Link: You can read the full story – Here )

Britain’s debt is even worse than I feared.

Late on Saturday night, I was researching Britain’s National Debt, and to my surprise and horror, I found it was even worse, than I suspected.

Anyone who has a mortgage, or variable rate loan, ought to be on pins and needles, as interest rates are set to rise, for a number of reasons.

Deutsche Bank’s chief economist David Folkerts-Landau just released a scathing report, aptly titled: “The ECB Must Change,” in which he calls the ECB out from a banker’s perspective, which is now eerily similar to a layman’s.

“After seven years of ever-looser monetary policy there is increasing evidence that following the current dogma, broad-based quantitative easing and negative interest rates, risks the long-term stability of the eurozone…

…Already it is clear that lower and lower interest rates and ever larger purchases are confronting the law of decreasing returns…. but the ECB’s response is to push policy to further extremes. This causes mis-allocations in the real economy that become increasingly hard to reverse without even greater pain. Savers lose, while stock and apartment owners rejoice…

Thereby ECB policy is threatening the European project as a whole for the sake of short-term financial stability…. The longer policy prevents the necessary catharsis, the more it contributes to the growth of populist or extremist politics…

A returning to market-based pricing of sovereign risk will incentivize governments to begin growth-friendly reforms and to tackle fiscal stability. Flagging the move should dampen adverse reactions in financial markets.

We believe that normalising rates would be seen as a positive signal by consumers and corporate investors. The longer the ECB persists with unconventional monetary policy, the greater the damage to the European project will be.”

Japanese Rate Rises?

And even in Japan, interest rate rises are being discussed:

Bank of Japan policy board member Takehiro Sato went public in a speech to business leaders two weeks ago. Here are some key quotes showing what amounts to complete opposition to the Bank of Japan’s current course:

“When there is a negative spread, shrinking the balance sheet, rather than expanding it, would be a reasonable business decision… leading to restraining loans to borrowers with potentially high credit costs and raising interest rates on loans to firms with poor access to finance.”

As for those borrowers, think SMEs, entrepreneurs, everyone from the middle-class down, and virtually everyone but the corporate interests that have succeeded in regulatory capture worldwide.

“A weakening of the financial intermediary functioning could affect the financial system’s resilience against shocks in times of stress.”

He also said:

“There is also the risk that financial institutions that have problems in terms of profitability or fiscal soundness will make loans and investment without adequate risk valuation… I detect a vulnerability similar to that seen before the so-called VaR (Value at Risk) shock in 2003.”

Taken together, Mr. Sato is essentially saying that negative rates are stunting the chances of economic growth, removing any chance to soften the blow when it comes, and is setting us all up for wealth destruction across the board, giving policy makers no capability to react if a downturn begins.

Japanese politicians seem to be taking the ball and running with it. A key policy chief of the opposition party is now calling for Prime Minister Abe and the BoJ to begin raising rates.

In particular, the new platform cites how these policies hurt savers, along with its failure to boost inflation, wages, and has a negative crash in trade balances.

And in America too, are Interest Rates set to rise?

Gerardo Del Real, the Outsider Club’s newest expert, is spot on on how this will pan out for the U.S. . Just last week, he had this to say, which bears repeating:

“So what to do? Understand that the big money, the portfolio managers, pension funds, and insurers cannot continue to invest exclusively in negative-yielding assets.

Understand that a trickle of the trillions they manage will work its way to the U.S. markets, the dollar, and gold. Not because they’re gold-bugs, but because they will have no choice.

Understand that of those three options — the U.S. stock market, the dollar, and gold — gold is the smallest market and therefore the most susceptible to the largest moves.

Within the gold market, the junior resource market — especially the junior gold companies — has been absolutely decimated, and provides the best risk-reward proposition.” (See my last post – Apocalypse Now)

Few people are more reviled by everyday people than bankers, and rightfully so.

They hide usury in the fine print and send Court Sherriffs to evict you from your home in their stead.

They distort and manipulate markets for their own gains, from LIBOR, to the gold fix, to silver prices, to exchange rates, and on and on.

Then, with the corruption of a wink and a nod, they use regulatory capture to remove all risk and collect cushy bailouts while manufacturing and commercial jobs disappear, wages shrink, and with it the tax base as neighborhoods fall into squalor.

Throughout the 80s, the North of England – Northumberland, Merseyside, Greater Manchester, South Wales were all hit hard as deep mined coal pits closed, and the industries that had grown up with them, went with them.

A piece written just over 100 years ago, after a Banking Panic in the U.S., brought about largely by the tactics of the Banks, and which surprisingly, our recent “Credit Crunch” appeared to be a mere replication writ large goes as below.

The writer, George Howard Earle, Jr. of the Real Estate Trust Company, in 1908 wrote:

A Central Bank as a Menace to Liberty

The solution of the problem of a central bank, with power to control the currency of the United States, to be at all adequate, must depend upon and be controlled by ultimate political principles.

The same principle that underlies the never-ending conflict between the advocates of a strong centralized government and what are called “states rights,” governs this question.

Taught in the school of experience and adversity, the early English and American patriots learned the salutary lesson that the development of peoples, as well as their happiness, depended more upon liberty – that is, the power to control and govern themselves, rather than to be controlled or governed by anybody else – than upon any other single thing; and they, therefore, in drafting our Constitution, always viewed government as an evil made necessary by the weakness and defects of human nature, and never extended it beyond that necessity.

Under the plan of freedom, of self-reliance, self-dependence, self-government, we have become the greatest, the happiest, the most powerful people of the world; but notwithstanding these proofs to justify the work of the Fathers, we have more and more concluded that we could have done a great deal better.

We are rapidly tending in the opposite direction, which must 506 inevitably destroy liberty by vesting all discretion in some form of central government, rather than in the people as individual, independent entities.

Starting with the theory that government but existed because of the defects of mankind, and was but an evil wherever it exceeded the necessity of restraining evil human tendencies, we have now reached the higher light wherein we produce schemes of regulating everything, until liberty is but a name, and we govern ourselves by theories entirely independent of the characteristics of the people to whom our systems are to apply.

It is difficult to find any one, nowadays, who has not some “counsel of perfection,” and founded on it, some theory of government that would work perfectly with a perfect race, in whom neither self-interest nor passion existed and that, consequently, did not need any government at all.

The same could be said of any central authority, whether in Britain, or further across Europe.

All control passed to others, means they will meddle. And in meddling, they will postpone the inevitable, but each time they postpone, the crisis merely gets bigger, and more unstable. Eventually, there is no-one big enough to stop it.

We will shortly find out, if this will be in the next credit crisis. Those who have salted away bit-coins, gold and silver, will fare best. Those who have borowed to feed their insatiable habit to spend, will not surprisingly, not do well.

Money, real money (Gold and Silver) takes time to make, is hewed from the ground at great expense, and whilst its value varies with the day, the month and the year, it’s value never disappears totally and increases over time – even if in fits and starts..

Credit created out of a Banker’s pen, printing plates, or these days computer, can disappear in a cloud of smoke. Over 200 currencies have disappeared since the dawn of the printing press, and fractional reserve lending, but Gold and Silver are still an ounce of Gold, and a Pound of Sterling Silver, from which Britain’s derived its name, and now our currency takes its name.

Central Bankers, therefore are more the problem, than the cure.

Here, Daniel Hannan – discusses the implications for the future with Emma Reynolds who puts forward the case to remain.. Daniel Hannan puts forward his reasons for wishing to leave.

A vote to Remain is a vote for…
Big Government
BIG Corporations
BIG Banks
and BIG BROTHER.

Britain, grew into the world’s superpower, in the 1800s, and now leader of the 64 nation Commonwealth, by extolling those things that we Brits hold dear. The law grew up from natural laws – “Common Law”, where people devised the behaviours they supported, and those they despised. Law was a higher source of guidance in man’s affairs, and it wasn’t handed down from  “on high” – i.e. from those holding the reins of power – as has been the case in most of the world – and particular the Eurasian legal systems – Roman Law, Napoleonic Law, or Regal Law.

This piece lays out the historical context.

Apocalypse Now?

Posted on Updated on

GlobaDebtlPyramid

The image above shows how all the wealth of the world, is really built on an inverted pyramid of real wealth. That means, all those products above the green zone, are not real wealth, but paper claims on wealth. When the next financial crisis occurs, the value of all those products, will equal the value of those in the green-zone. They’re all derivatives – which means either the derivatives lose their value, the Gold and Silver raises its value, or some combination of the two.

Our figure heads, whether of Royal Blood, Presidential or Prime Ministerial appointees, have a large coterie of advisers, and those who pull the strings and influence events, behind the scenes.

Since, I began studying Markets, Politics, and Economics, in my student days in the 1980s, there has been a growing awareness of the Deep State. And those bankers who are part of it, manipulate the currency for their own ends. LIBOR, EURIBOR, COMEX prices and even asset values.

See: Banking Puppet-Masters

The power behind the throne, goes back far longer though, than most people recognise, and this group of people dictate the way that democracy, and politics is carried out from behind the curtain, particularly in the U.S. and the British upper class, who before them, were essentially the experts at this behind the door control.

During the early days of Banking, many of these Banking families – Rothschild, Morgan, Chase, Barclays, Seif, Warburg, Baring, and others, provided the finance, that allowed (or denied) what those figure heads could do.

In the days of the Royal Households of Europe, this essentially meant the ability to raise finance to fund an army, and wage war. For the financiers, it often meant funding both sides, and backing both horses in a two horse race.

It was usually a winning proposition for the bankers, whoever won the war. The debt remained, due to capitalism’s basic principle – “The Law of Contract” – even if the basic tenets of contracts have been watered down over many years, to allow people (mostly women) to change their minds… as on-line retailers are currently finding to their cost.

Baron Rothschild, famously got wind of Wellington’s win at Waterloo in 1815, ahead of the rest of the City of London, and sold off his holdings. Only for those who saw him, to react in his wake and follow suit. Rothschild then went on a wild buying spree, buying up assets for essentially “pennies on the dollar” as the Americans might say. When the dust settled, a huge transfer of wealth had occured from those shareholders who sold to the Baron and his family.

And so the model that bankers follow has remained to this day. Bankers know more about the inner financial position of their clients, than any other group of individuals. They wouldn’t use that knowledge to strike, when the iron is hot… Would they?

Banks loan out currency driving up property and corporate asset prices to unsustainable levels, only for the the currency supply to tighten, and thus cause a crisis, so that assets get sold off on the cheap. In the most recent example, we saw house prices rising inexorably, as Banks increasingly lent to those who might be considered high risk – the “sub-prime” market many have heard of. They then took advantage as the dead hand of property – mortgage holders took advantage as buyers defaulted on their mortgage payments, and the banks got thousands of homes on the cheap. Hank Paulson, allegedly made $5 billion in the sub-prime mortgage debt bomb. In a world without fiat currency, interest rates would adjust according to monetary demand, and cool things, or only allow those projects with highest return to be funded.

As an example, in the last crisis, bankers loaned to businesses such as Neil Mitchell, who bought a hotel, using finance and set about redeveloping it. In the final weeks before opening, his Bank, HSBC, used their restructure arm – and removed his financial support, causing his business to fail before it had even begun trading. They took the mortgaged asset (his hotel), completed the minor works still left to do, and now run a Hotel making them an income from all Mr Mitchell’s hard work. Imagine how frustrating it is for him, and all the other business owners like him who don’t have access to the information, that the Banks have, and withold from their sheep, waiting to be sheared in the next financial crisis.

During the final stages of the previous supercycle of commodities, that lasted from the mid 1960s to the early 1980s (about 18years) prices of most commodities rose manyfold. and in the Banking Sector, quite a few mid-size Banks folded in the 1973 Banking crisis. Then the UK. FT-30 stock market famously fell 83% reaching 156 and the UK government felt obliged to prop up failing industries and nationalised many of them – British Steel, British Airways, British Leyland, to name but a few.

Since the early 1980s, the thinking has changed – failed businesses should be sold off to their stronger competitors, as the Banks and other financial institutions – AIG, Fannie Mae, Freddie-Mac, Bear-Stearns, Lehman Bros, Lloyds, TSB, RBS, Northern Rock, and others were. (Though recent news regarding Bear-Stearns may concern many of its former investors.)

I’ve been thinking something similar to the 1970s will happen again, ever since I began studying this commodities super-cycle at the start of the millennium…Back then, Gold, and Silver went up just as it did in the 70s. Inflation took off in the late 60s, and early 70s, rising almost 8-fold for Gold, before pulling back by almost half.

Over the next 4-5 years (1974-79), prices fell first by close-to 50%, and then from 76 onwards, began rising, shallowly at first, but with increasing momentum, rising 8-fold again from the mid-cycle lows to peak at $850/oz in 1981 for Gold, and close to $50 for silver..

That, by my reckoning, if repeated, would take us to circa $8,500 for Gold, and $500 for silver by 2018/19 or in the years either side of these..

I put that forecast into print (on-line of course) as long ago as 2005. But as Jim Rickards and James Dale Davidson state, the next FOMC meeting on June 16th, will be critical. If they raise rates, this will suggest that the economy is healthy (Ha!) If not, we may see a major sell-off in the markets, preparation for QE4.. and that will probably send Gold (and Silver) eventually skywards…

Jim Rickards has even gone on record as suggesting a price for Gold of almost $14,500 for Gold. Wherever it goes, the price will be multiples of where it is now.

And this image below – compares the cycles from 68-76, with the period from 2000 – 2014. Anyone cannot fail to notice the similarities, merely the length of time is different.

Gold Price - 1968-2014

It has often been said, that history repeats itself, and many say that it doesn’t repeat, but it rhymes. The difference is, this time it really IS different… In the 1970s the super-cycle was essentially limited to Europe and the English speaking peoples – North America, Australasia, Southern Africa, and the suppliers of those commodities in Africa, who borrowed heavily as commodities rose, and then had control of those assets sold when commodity prices inevitably fell in the early 1980s causing national solvency crises in those indebted countries…This time the whole world, with 2.5 billion Asians and another several hundred million South Americans will be involved.

IF, or rather WHEN, the global meltdown begins, the governments and their Central Bankers, will have two options…

1. Do nothing (Unlikely)
2. Intervene with more monetary stimulus.

It is my view (and that of many others) that they will intervene.

What might trigger the Global Collapse?

As I’ve said before, a decision by Saudi-Arabia to sell oil in a currency other than dollars will bring an end to the agreement put in place in 1975, which propped up the dollar, and made it King Dollar.

The decision by the KSA, might (almost certainly, would) incur the wrath of the US of A, so along with an agreement to sell in an alternative currency, would also need some other nation’s military to back it up… China? Perhaps, but unlikely – at least not yet. Iraq’s leader Saddam Hussein, and Libya’s leader Colonel Muammar el-Qaddaffi, both attempted to sell oil in currencies other than dollars, and the outcome is there for all to see. A similar situation might prevail in the Saudi peninsula, which could trigger a spike in oil prices if major oil facilities were involved, and this would disrupt world markets and possibly trigger the meltdown.

Another potential trigger is a major nation defaulting on a payment to the Central Banks and the bond holders – such as triggered the Cyprus banking collapse, and the next domino Greece which put the PIIGS in jeopardy as the Banking crisis unfolded…

Another potential trigger is a major bank becoming insolvent. This could be caused because a business or country, with bank support, and perhaps large outstanding loans, fails, causing a major loss, over and above the banks ability to absorb those losses, causing a cascade.

It might be a major loss on a trade by a trader (similar to the London Whale) which affected JPM-Chase costing it $6.2billion in 2012, or as was directly the cause of the Barings Bank failure in February 1995, when Nick Leeson lost £827 million (circa $1.19 Billion at current exchange rates) a Bank that had held the English Monarch’s finances since King George V.

However, less well known according to Wikipedia, is the allegation that Barings Bank’s near insolvency in November 1890, as a result of a debt crisis in Argentina, caused the credit crisis of the early 1890’s and quoted from a book by John T. Flynn – written in 1932 “The preceding year [in 1890] the great Baring failure had shaken London and the rest of the financial world. America was shielded from its most virulent effects because of a bountiful wheat crop. But the following year all the forces of business disturbance were assembling, though the country as a whole hardly realized it. Gold was leaving the country at an alarming rate.”

As usual, when the financial world faces a crisis, Gold [and silver] is the safe haven of choice of large swathes of the investing world. And this sudden interest, drives prices higher… often much higher.

Barings also stands accused of supporting the south in the American civil war, and the Louisiana purchase, plus supporting France in the Napoleonic wars. As I have said, Banks will support whatever is in their interest, whether that is good for the rest of us – or not.

A solution going begging?

In my last post, I referred to a producing junior Gold miner, quoted right here in the UK. A company, I have been following for some 12 years. A company that has seen many twists and turns as management changes, and investments in different countries and ore bodies has impacted the scale and ownership of this company’s assets. But Geopolitics has also been a major factor. However, with the only mine, smelter and refinery of its type in the whole of sub-Saharan Africa, which to build such a facility from scratch, would run to $500-750 million.

The company has land holdings in 5 countries – with 2 producing mines. Not all of which are wholly owned, but like in many jurisdictions, jointly owned to a greater or lesser degree with state governments.

The producing Gold mine, comprises a shallow underground operation, currently mining at a depth of circa 200m and processing ore through a single facility utilising a combination of crushing, conventional sag milling, combined gravity and CIL process, electro-winning and bullion smelting.

A recent fund raising, to allow phased refurbishment of plant ran in two phases: the re-capitalisation of the mining fleet and refurbishment of one of the two mills, brought the mine back into production targeting a production rate of 2,500 oz of Gold per month (about 30,000 oz per annum). This was exceeded with Gold production re-commencing in October 2009, and the production for the financial year to end of the Financial year 2014 was almost 59,000 oz of gold, down slightly, from the previous year. Figures for 2015 are due in several weeks, and thus will give us an indicator of current affairs and cost structure.

The second phase of the programme included, refurbishment of the second mill and expansion of the leach circuit. In June 2011, the Company announced that the Phase 2 construction programme was completed with Mill 2 being successfully commissioned on time and within budget. Further, in March 2014 a pilot plant to recover gold from 13Mt of tailings was commissioned.

In its current mines, it holds reserves and resources totalling in excess of 3million ounces, in 2 countries, with controlled costs, and evidence of more potential in several of its holdings.

A recent management change has also reduced costs, such that all-in costs (C3) are now almost at break-even (@ circa $1250/ozt) Though of course, Gold’s NY price rose, earlier in the year, breaching $1300 before Janet Yellen’s dovish speech suggested that a rate hike was on the cards, and the markets saw this as an opportunity to buy the dollar. This strengthened the dollar on international currency markets, and Gold fell back as a result. Currently close to $1210/ozt (02-Jun-16). But, if the expected rate hike doesn’t materialise, it will also be taken by the markets as economic weakness, and a sign that more QE may be required. That may cause a sell-off in the dollar, and will send Gold up again.
Few opportunities exist in life to make huge sums of money, but this is one such time.

If you want to know more about this junior miner, and its prospects then respond in the comments box below, supplying your e-mail, and I will supply a fuller picture, details in reply.

The Road To Serfdom?

Posted on

0311_china-gold-hording_416x416
China’s Gold Hoard – is bigger than they claim – MUCH bigger.

In the last 12months, the World economy, has taken a distinct turn for the worse…Starting last summer, the Federal Reserve announced it would begin normalising interest rates. (read: raising them, by baby steps)

They intimated in FOMC minutes, last year that they expected to increase rates by 4 times in the next twelve months. As it is, some nine months later, they have managed to raise by just 0.25% and they now feel that they will manage only 2 increments by year end.

As the Fed Funds rate was raised by 25 points last year, the DJIA fell from its new all time high at almost 18,300 in early May 2015 to 15,670 in August 2015, and early February this year, before bouncing higher on interest rate movement

However, several commentators – Doug Casey, Jim Rickards, Bill Bonner, James Dale Davidson and others have commented that many large corporations are actually borrowing money at low interest rates to buy back their own shares, to maintain the illusion of prosperity, by reducing the number of shares in issue, which increases the value of those shares that remain.

The FT100 which peaked at just over 7,100, for only the second time since 2000, in 2015, has generally bounced around in a downward direction, reaching 5,500 in February this year, before some of the Brexit talk began in earnest, in recent weeks, and bouncing up to 6,400 mark in April. However, recent Brexit fears have again driven markets down towards 6,250 (6,262.85 as I write), and the trend appears down.

Indices around the world rose yesterday, except in Turkey, Argentina, China and Colombia where they continued their downward slide. Several Economies in the Americas – notably Brazil and Venezuela, are experiencing rising inflation. Indeed, a Sky News report, quoting the IMF suggested inflation in Venezuela, could rise to 4,500% over the next 3 years, unless something is done to change things.

Socialism, is once again being proven to be a failure. This has echoes of the 1970s, when Britain too faced its own crisis. And America too seems to be heading down this road.

See this:

A Letter to America… Don’t follow the European model… Daniel Hannan – MEP.
(A warning also to Remainians?)

In Venezuela, as Britain then, they have huge reserves of oil, but as new exploration, and fracking – particularly in American states, raised production, their levels last seen 30-40 years ago, at around 9-10 million bopd.

Prices went from $121 bbl to $28, over the winter period, but as the traditional summer driving season begins in America, coupled with rising vehicle numbers in India and China, and some slacking off of production, as several American oil producers have succumbed to the lower prices, oil has bounced back to the $48/barrel mark, and should remain in this $50-70 region for the foreseeable, unless, some of those new producers collapse even at these prices, and demand remains firm.

Both Brazil’s and Venezuela’s oil industries have suffered partly to corruption issues, but also there appears to be some involvement by America’s dark state, at least according to Nomi Prinz, ex Goldman-Sachs employee, and now author of several books as she appeared with Max Keiser, on the Keiser Reporton Tuesday.

All it will take is one large domino to fall in the next few weeks, and the prediction by James Dale Davidson (See Pic) will no doubt come to fruition.

EconomicPrediction-May-24th-2016

The IMF appears to be very concerned about world events spinning out of control, as the chief plate spinner extraordinaire – Madame Lagarde – appears to be struggling to keep all the world’s plates from crashing. She will undoubtedly have to run to keep all these increasingly unstable plates on the top of their poles.

Talk in the markets has also begun discussing QE4… Is this likely, as Gold has stumbled at the $1300 level, and pulled back? From a trading perspective, the Gold (AU) RSI (Relative Strength Index) hit 70, which suggests a temporary over-bought status, but this pull back will prove ephemeral too – perhaps lasting until the end of summer.

As George Soros, Hank Paulson, China, India, and many American Billionaires wiith their finger on the pulse, sense the mode shift, and begin buyng Gold again, while mainstream buyers sit on the sidelines – for now. However, the World Gold Council reported the strongest first quarter on record for Global Gold Demand. And the COMEX ratio of owners to ounces hits an new all time high – 500:1, meaning only the first person in 500 will get physical possession of their physical ounces, if they demand delivery. The rest will go begging.

When the general public gets involved, in this new gold bull, this will translate into direct increases to the bottom line for Gold miners, and the sector that gains most on such moves are the juniors. One such junior producer in Africa, has already experienced an almost 100% improvement over the last 5months from its extreme lows.

Although four nations already have taken steps down the road of Negative Interest Rates (NIRP) – Japan, Switzerland, Sweden and Denmark, with the U.S. also now considering this, if this happens, the rush to Gold (And by association – silver) will ensue, and the rise I predicted some years previously to happen in the 2018-19 period will come true..

I will be discussing the above miner in more detail in a future post.

But Jim Rickards latest prediction for the Gold price is over $14,400 per ounce.( See below)

EconomicPrediction-May-25th-2016

I think he may be slightly over pessimistic, but not by much.

And all other commodities will rise in similar fashion. If you haven’t got Gold, then your Dollars, Pounds, Yen or Yuan, or whatever currency you use, will be worth concomitantly less. and even a median income will feel like serfdom.

Time to put circa 20% of your wealth into precious metals. (in my humble opinion.)

But here Daniel Hannan, explains how the English speaking peoples made the world. (Even if some of them, are out to steal it from us)

 

Until next time.

Digital Currency – The Last Refuge of a Banking Scoundrel?

Posted on Updated on

In the news over the weekend, we heard the story that Andrew Haldane, the chief economist and executive director for monetary analysis and statistics at the UK’s Bank of England, has tried to run up the flagpole, the prospect of a digital only currency. America too is discussing this.

Now, why would a Banker do this?

What is a Bank? Primarily it stores savings (Capital) for its customers, and loans out this money (well we’ll call it money for now) to businesses and others to finance the development of new products and services, which add value, assist in growth, employ people, and spread prosperity throughout the nation (or currency union).

However, when a country has excess savings, these are liabilities on the bank’s books, and has been touched on several times throughout the time of this blog, these have to be paid back. However, there may be times when there are fewer good opportunities to loan money out for the banks, with huge amounts of money sitting in savings and today is one such time.

The driving force behind this excess savings is demographics. Demographics is the study of populations. The studies look at birth, and death rates, gender etc, and at how those births and deaths impact the society, and the economy. Where we build schools, hospitals, and even infrastructure like industrial parks.

After the second world war, all those returning service personnel got busy making babies. It happened in America and the Pacific region in ’47, it happened in Europe in ’46, as those two major conflagrations came to an end.

Twenty years later in the sixties, those babies, now young adults drove the swinging sixties, and Carnaby Street, the music and fashion scene as they all began doing what young people do. The children of those people reached maturity 20 years later, in the 80s and early 90s, driving Punk music, New-wave and the New Romantics, the “Acid house” scene, and the Brit-pop and Indie scenes of the 90s. This was the shadow boom as you might call it. These children of the baby-boomers are driving the economy now, as they reach their 40s, and lead consumption spending, but soon this too will slow.

Of course the baby-boomers as they are known, those born after WWII, are now frantically saving for their retirements, buying buy-to-let properties, and investing in their pension funds and therein lies the rub. All that capital going into savings has led to several booms; in Technology, in Housing, and since the 2009 credit crunch, the stock-markets in general. But since early 2012, the baby-boomers have been retiring in droves at the rate of circa 8-10,000 people per day, in the U.S. alone, and because of the low interest rates, and the drive to “save the economy” the Central Banks have loaned the people, and their representatives (governments) huge amounts of money.

America has an $18 Trillion public debt. Britain is in an even worse situation (person for person) with a public debt of £1.4 Trillion ($2Trillion+) And those Bankers are now worried that they might not get their money back.

And what IS money? When money was just Gold and Silver, the Bankers got rich, by lending pieces of paper, that were exchangeable for Gold and Silver, that they had mysteriously created out of nothing more than paper and ink. This fractional reserve lending, grew their power, and grew their immense wealth.

The Houses of Rothschild, Morgan, Seif, Rockefeller and others who ran or owned Banks became the powers behind the thrones of more countries than could be imagined.

Digital Currency Drawbacks?

If we can just take our money “out of the banks”, this should force Bank Presidents to be prudent with it, or, as we saw with Northern Rock, we get a run on the Banks. When our money (or rather currency) is just digits on a Bank Balance sheet, we cannot. This means Bankers can fund whatever they want, without worrying about us cutting off their drug supply.

But a purely digital currency has several other drawbacks too.

With a purely digital currency, EVERY transaction will register on a computer somewhere. Tax Authorities will therefore be able to trace every transaction – And TAX it. That tax goes to pay salaries of government employees, but it also pays for those in politics, who may not always disclose where that money goes: Funding Wars overseas, providing incentives and making deals in private rooms under the guise of “National Security”, and it pays off the loans that bankers make to governments – all made possible by greater tax taking.

But a further worry is that the account details of every person will also need to be held somewhere too, making the prospect of 1984 as written about by George Orwell a frightening reality.

The informal economy disappears too.

Tipping a waiter, a Cabbie, a Pizza Delivery boy or even the Bin-man come Xmas time, becomes almost impossible. The loss of these ways of showing appreciation, potentially makes poor service a given, as with no financial incentive to provide excellent service, these people may offer mediocre service at best, or even leave the industry making many restaurants forced to pay higher wages forcing up costs, and thus reducing the number of visits per week, per month or per year. Giving someone a £50 note for a Birthday present, or Xmas present becomes impossible too. Teenagers everywhere will suffer, and grand-parents will actually have to get to know them and find out what their kids actually need – or want – and they may get a few unusual requests or worse…

But, the one big drawback for everyone, is not zero interest, it is negative interest rates. Which means charging you to hold your money. Anyone with savings in an account, or perhaps as the result of a house sale, becomes just another potential donor to a Banker’s lifestyle.

BUT the ultimate issue is one of liberty and trust. A business deal of old, demanded nothing more than the money, and a handshake. This relied on trust of the money, and the person. In a digital world, all trust comes down to is your credit rating, and your government granted identity number. Perhaps ultimately your radio frequency identification (RFID) chip implanted under your skin, so you don’t even need to carry a bank card.

But it also opens up a world of potential to deny you access to things the government thinks you shouldn’t see, or get access to. In effect WE become slaves to government, and the people who pull their strings, instead of government working for us. And that is the most important reason, why it should NEVER be considered the only way to pay.

“Bank paper must be suppressed and the circulation restored to the nation to whom it belongs.
“The power to issue money should be taken from the banks and restored to congress and the people.
“I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.
“I am not among those who fear the people. They and not the rich, are our dependence for continued freedom. And to preserve their independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt.”

Thomas Jefferson – Former President of the U.S. of A.

And in his farewell address to the people, March 3, 1837, President Andrew Jackson solemnly warned the people against the Banker’s power, after the recent financial crisis; as the “Credit Crunch” is still ringing in our ears, it appears VERY apposite

“We are not left to conjecture how the moneyed power, thus organized, and with such a weapon in its hands, would be likely to use it. The distress and alarm which pervaded and agitated the whole country, when the Bank of the United States waged war upon the people in order to compel them to submit to their demands, cannot yet be forgotten.

The ruthless and unsparing temper with which whole cities and communities were oppressed, individuals impoverished and ruined, a scene of cheerful prosperity suddenly changed into one of gloom and despondency, ought to be indelibly impressed on the memory of the people of the United States. If such was its power in a time of peace, what would it not have been in a season of war, with an enemy at your doors.

No nation but the freeman of the United States could have come out victorious from such contest; yet, if you had not conquered, the Government would have passed from the hands of the many to the hands of the few; and this organized money power, from its secret conclave, would have dictated the choice of your highest officers, and compelled you to make peace or war, as best suited their own wishes. The form of your Government might for a time have remained, but its living spirit would have departed from it.”
(Read more at: The Coming Battle 2013 )

And Finally, if the above comes to pass, what will our International trading partners make of a currency, that can be conjured up on a computer by a banker? If China sells us Cars, Computer Equipment, Smart-phones etc, and all they get in return is a ledger entry on a computer, what confidence will they have that those digits will be worth anything, when they decide to spend them, possibly years later. What would you do if you were China?

If we are ever to have international finance based on trust, then there is only one solution – currency must be in the final analysis, backed by precious metals. and those metals represent true value, even if their value may vary from time to time – but Gold is still gold, and Silver is still silver. Platinum, and Palladium too are useful – usable in catalysts, jewelry and other uses. Silver is usable in 10,000 uses and rising, and its value and availability are about to get a whole lot rarer, and a whole lot more expensive as a result.

So if this does come to pass, who is really in charge in the UK? The Government? or its Financiers?

If you want to move your money out of the Bankers’ way? Then Click Here to get started.
PS:
After posting this I discovered a video clip by Max Keiser of the Keiser Report, which mentions the speech by Andy Haldane. Let me know what you think below.


W.